Targeted Review of Internal Models (TRIM): Review of observations and findings for Traded Risk
May 2021
5 min read
Authors:
Hardial Kalsi, Robert Pullman
Share:
Discover the significant deficiencies uncovered by the EBA’s TRIM on-site inspections and how banks must swiftly address these to ensure compliance and mitigate risk.
The EBA has recently published the findings and observations from their TRIM on-site inspections. A significant number of deficiencies were identified and are required to be remediated by institutions in a timely fashion.
Since the Global Financial Crisis 2007-09, concerns have been raised regarding the complexity and variability of the models used by institutions to calculate their regulatory capital requirements. The lack of transparency behind the modelling approaches made it increasingly difficult for regulators to assess whether all risks had been appropriately and consistently captured.
The TRIM project was a large-scale multi-year supervisory initiative launched by the ECB at the beginning of 2016. The project aimed to confirm the adequacy and appropriateness of approved Pillar I internal models used by Significant Institutions (SIs) in euro area countries. This ensured their compliance with regulatory requirements and aimed to harmonise supervisory practices relating to internal models.
TRIM executed 200 on-site internal model investigations across 65 SIs from over 10 different countries. Over 5,800 deficiencies were identified. Findings were defined as deficiencies which required immediate supervisory attention. They were categorised depending on the actual or potential impact on the institution’s financial situation, the levels of own funds and own funds requirements, internal governance, risk control, and management.
The findings have been followed up with 253 binding supervisory decisions which request that the SIs mitigate these shortcomings within a timely fashion. Immediate action was required for findings that were deemed to take a significant time to address.
Assessment of Market Risk
TRIM assessed the VaR/sVaR models of 31 institutions. The majority of severe findings concerned the general features of the VaR and sVaR modelling methodology, such as data quality and risk factor modelling.
19 out of 31 institutions used historical simulation, seven used Monte Carlo, and the remainder used either a parametric or mixed approach. 17 of the historical simulation institutions, and five using Monte Carlo, used full revaluation for most instruments. Most other institutions used a sensitivities-based pricing approach.
VaR/sVaR Methodology
Data: Issues with data cleansing, processing and validation were seen in many institutions and, on many occasions, data processes were poorly documented.
Risk Factors: In many cases, risk factors were missing or inadequately modelled. There was also insufficient justification or assessment of assumptions related to risk factor modelling.
Pricing: Institutions frequently had inadequate pricing methods for particular products, leading to a failure for the internal model to adequately capture all material price risks. In several cases, validation activities regarding the adequacy of pricing methods in the VaR model were insufficient or missing.
RNIME: Approximately two-thirds of the institutions had an identification process for risks not in model engines (RNIMEs). For ten of these institutions, this directly led to an RNIME add-on to the VaR or to the capital requirements.
Regulatory Backtesting
Period and Business Days: There was a lack of clear definitions of business and non-business days at most institutions. In many cases, this meant that institutions were trading on local holidays without adequate risk monitoring and without considering those days in the P&L and/or the VaR.
APL: Many institutions had no clear definition of fees, commissions or net interest income (NII), which must be excluded from the actual P&L (APL). Several institutions had issues with the treatment of fair value or other adjustments, which were either not documented, not determined correctly, or were not properly considered in the APL. Incorrect treatment of CVAs and DVAs and inconsistent treatment of the passage of time (theta) effect were also seen.
HPL: An insufficient alignment of pricing functions, market data, and parametrisation between the economic P&L (EPL) and the hypothetical P&L (HPL), as well as the inconsistent treatment of the theta effect in the HPL and the VaR, was seen in many institutions.
Internal Validation and Internal Backtesting
Methodology: In several cases, the internal backtesting methodology was considered inadequate or the levels of backtesting were not sufficient.
Hypothetical Backtesting: The required backtesting on hypothetical portfolios was either not carried or was only carried out to a very limited extent
IRC Methodology
TRIM assessed the IRC models of 17 institutions, reviewing a total of 19 IRC models. A total of 120 findings were identified and over 80% of institutions that used IRC models received at least one high-severity finding in relation to their IRC model. All institutions used a Monte Carlo simulation method, with 82% applying a weekly calculation. Most institutions obtained rates from external rating agency data. Others estimated rates from IRB models or directly from their front office function. As IRC lacks a prescriptive approach, the choice of modelling approaches between institutes exhibited a variety of modelling assumptions, as illustrated below.
Recovery rates: The use of unjustified or inaccurate Recovery Rates (RR) and Probability of Defaults (PD) values were the cause of most findings. PDs close to or equal to zero without justification was a common issue, which typically arose for the modelling of sovereign obligors with high credit quality. 58% of models assumed PDs lower than one basis point, typically for sovereigns with very good ratings but sometimes also for corporates. The inconsistent assignment of PDs and RRs, or cases of manual assignment without a fully documented process, also contributed to common findings.
Modellingapproach: The lack of adequate modelling justifications presented many findings, including copula assumptions, risk factor choice, and correlation assumptions. Poor quality data and the lack of sufficient validation raised many findings for the correlation calibration.
Assessment of Counterparty Credit Risk
Eight banks faced on-site inspections under TRIM for counterparty credit risk. Whilst the majority of investigations resulted in findings of low materiality, there were severe weaknesses identified within validation units and overall governance frameworks.
Conclusion
Based on the findings and responses, it is clear that TRIM has successfully highlighted several shortcomings across the banks. As is often the case, many issues seem to be somewhat systemic problems which are seen in a large number of the institutions. The issues and findings have ranged from fundamental problems, such as missing risk factors, to more complicated problems related to inadequate modelling methodologies. As such, the remediation of these findings will also range from low to high effort. The SIs will need to mitigate the shortcomings in a timely fashion, with some more complicated or impactful findings potentially taking a considerable time to remediate.
This article is intended for finance, risk, and compliance professionals with business and system integration knowledge of SAP, but also includes contextual guidance for broader audiences.
1.
Our team at Zanders has been at the forefront of implementing BACS AUDDIS (Automated Direct Debit Instruction Service) with SAP S/4HANA, helping clients to streamline their direct debit
Thailand's e-Withholding Tax (e-WHT) system officially launched on October 27, 2020, in collaboration with 11 banks, marking a significant digital transformation with far-reaching benefits for
In today’s rapidly evolving financial landscape, fortifying the Financial Risk Management (FRM) function remains a top priority for CFOs. Zanders has identified a growing trend among
Emergence of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
The rise of ChatGPT has brought generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into the mainstream, accelerating adoption across
Introduction
In December 2024, FINMA published a new circular on nature-related financial (NRF) risks. Our main take-aways:
NRF risks not only comprise climate-related risks,
As mid-sized corporations expand, enhancing their Treasury function becomes essential. International growth, exposure to multiple currencies, evolving regulatory requirements, and increased
Industry surveys show that FRTB may lead to a 60% increase in regulatory market risk capital requirements, placing significant pressure on banks. As regulatory market risk capital requirements
First, these regions were analyzed independently such that common trends and differences could be noted within. These results were aggregated for each region such that these regions could be
The EU instant payments regulation1 comes into force on the 5th October this year. Importantly from a corporate perspective, it includes a VoP (verification of payee) regulation that requires
Human activities such as deforestation, pollution, and resource over-extraction have caused a dramatic decline in biodiversity, with approximately 1 million species at risk of extinction,
The evolution of the payments industry over the past 20 years has been significant, both in terms of the number of available settlement methods and how transactions can now be made. At a
In the ongoing efforts to enhance tax transparency for multinational corporations, tax authorities have progressively increased scrutiny on intercompany financial transactions. While the
With recent volatility in financial markets, firms need increasingly faster pre-trade and risk calculations to react swiftly to changing markets. Traditional computing methods for these
The implementation update covers observations, recommendations and supervisory tools to enhance the assessment of IRRBB risks for institutions and supervisors.1 Main topics include
Over the past year, the interest rates on intercompany financial transactions have come under closer examination by tax authorities. This intensified scrutiny stems from a mix of
At Zanders, we are proud to announce the promotion of Tobias Westermaier as our newest partner. With a rich background in Corporate Finance and Treasury, he brings a wealth of experience and a
Introduction: Faster, smarter, and future-proof
In the fast-paced financial industry , speed and accuracy are paramount. Banks are tasked with the complex calculation of XVAs
In the high-stakes world of Private Equity (PE), where exceptional returns are non-negotiable, value creation strategies have evolved far beyond financial engineering. Today, operational
For many, December is the most magical time of the year. It is a season filled with the warmth of family members, the joy of hanging out with friends, and the coziness of gathering around the