At the end of July, the European Banking Authority (EBA) released the results on the latest installment of the EU-wide stress test that is performed every two years.
Seventy banks have been considered, which is an increase of twenty banks compared to the previous exercise. The portfolios of the participating banks contain around three quarters of all EU banking assets (Euro and non-Euro).
Interested in how the four Dutch banks participating in this EBA stress test exercise performed? In this short note we compare them with the EU average as represented in the results published [1].
General comments
The general conclusion from the EU wide stress test results is that EU banks seem sufficiently capitalized. We quote the main 5 points as highlighted in the EBA press release [1]:
The results of the 2023 EU-wide stress test show that European banks remain resilient under an adverse scenario which combines a severe EU and global recession, increasing interest rates and higher credit spreads.
This resilience of EU banks partly reflects a solid capital position at the start of the exercise, with an average fully-loaded CET1 ratio of 15% which allows banks to withstand the capital depletion under the adverse scenario.
The capital depletion under the adverse stress test scenario is 459 bps, resulting in a fully loaded CET1 ratio at the end of the scenario of 10.4%. Higher earnings and better asset quality at the beginning of the 2023 both help moderate capital depletion under the adverse scenario.
Despite combined losses of EUR 496bn, EU banks remain sufficiently apitalized to continue to support the economy also in times of severe stress.
The high current level of macroeconomic uncertainty shows however the importance of remaining vigilant and that both supervisors and banks should be prepared for a possible worsening of economic conditions.
For further details we refer to the full EBA report [1].
Dutch banks
Making the case for transparency across the banking sector, the EBA has released a detailed breakdown of relevant figures for each individual bank. We use some of this data to gain further insight into the performance of the main Dutch banks versus the EU average.
CET1 ratios
Using the data presented by EBA [2], we display the evolution of the fully loaded CET1 ratio for the four banks versus the average over all EU banks in the figure below. The four Dutch banks are: ING, Rabobank, ABN AMRO and de Volksbank, ordered by size.
From the figure, we observe the following:
Compared to the average EU-wide CET1 ratio (indicated by the horizontal lines in the graph above), it can be observed that three out of four of the banks are very close to the EU average.
For the average EU wide CET1 ratio we observe a significant drop from year 1 to year 2, while for the Dutch banks the impact of the stress is more spread out over the full scenario horizon.
The impact after year 4 of the stress horizon is more severe than the EU average for three out of four of the Dutch banks.
Evolution of retail mortgages during adverse scenario
The most important product the four Dutch banks have in common are the retail mortgages. We look at the evolution of the retail mortgage portfolios of the Dutch banks compared to the EU average. Using EBA data provided [2], we summarize this in the following chart:
Based on the analysis above , we observe:
There is a noticeable variation between the banks regarding the migrations between the IFRS stages.
Compared to the EU average there are much less mortgages with a significant increase in credit risk (migrations to IFRS stage 2) for the Dutch banks. For some banks the percentage of loans in stage 2 is stable or even decreases.
Conclusion
This short note gives some indication of specifics of the 2023 EBA stress applied to the four main Dutch banks.
Should you wish to go deeper into this subject, Zanders has both the expertise and track record to assist financial organisations with all aspects of stress testing. Please get in touch.
In the high-stakes world of Private Equity (PE), where exceptional returns are non-negotiable, value creation strategies have evolved far beyond financial engineering. Today, operational
For many, December is the most magical time of the year. It is a season filled with the warmth of family members, the joy of hanging out with friends, and the coziness of gathering around the
The near-final PRA Rulebook PS9/24 published on 12 September 2024 includes substantial changes in credit risk regulation compared to the Consultation Paper CP16/22. While these amendments
The ECB Banking Supervision has identified deficiencies in effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting (RDARR) as a key vulnerability in its planning of supervisory priorities for the
Recently, Zanders' own Sander de Vries (Director and Head of Zanders’ Financial Risk Management Advisory Practice) and Nick Gage (Senior VP: FX Solutions at Kyriba) hosted a webinar. During
The Right Payment Orchestration Strategy: A Critical Factor for Success
The digitalization and globalization of payment infrastructures have significantly impacted businesses in
In our previous article 'Navigating the Financial Complexity of Carve-Outs: The Treasury Transformation Challenge and Zanders’ Expert Solution' we outlined that in a carve-out, the TOM for
In today's dynamic economic landscape, optimizing portfolio composition to fortify against challenges such as inflation, slower growth, and geopolitical tensions is ever more paramount. These
Effective liquidity management is essential for businesses of all sizes, yet achieving it is often challenging. Many organizations face difficulties due to fragmented data, inconsistent
Exploring S/4HANA Functionalities
The roundtable session started off with the presentation of SAP on some of the new S/4HANA functionalities. New functionalities in the areas of
Accurately attributing changes in counterparty credit exposures is essential for understanding risk profiles and making informed decisions. However, traditional approaches for exposure
However, CCR remains an essential element in banking risk management, particularly as it converges with valuation adjustments. These changes reflect growing regulatory expectations, which were
The timelines for the entire exercise have been extended to accommodate the changes in scope: Launch of exercise (macro scenarios)Second half of January 2025First submission of results to
Within the field of financial risk management, professionals strive to develop models to tackle the complexities in the financial domain. However, due to the ever-changing nature of financial
Addressing biodiversity (loss) is not only relevant from an impact perspective; it is also quickly becoming a necessity for financial institutions to safeguard their portfolios against
SAP highlighted their public vs. private cloud offerings, RISE and GROW products, new AI chatbot applications, and their SAP Analytics Cloud solution. In addition to SAP's insights, several
SAP In-House Cash (IHC) has enabled corporates to centralize cash, streamline payment processes, and recording of intercompany positions via the deployment of an internal bank. S/4 HANA
Historically, SAP faced limitations in this area, but recent innovations have addressed these challenges. This article explores how the XML framework within SAP’s Advanced Payment Management
Despite the several global delays to FRTB go-live, many banks are still struggling to be prepared for the implementation of profit and loss attribution (PLA) and the risk factor eligibility
In a world of persistent market and economic volatility, the Corporate Treasury function is increasingly taking on a more strategic role in navigating the uncertainties and driving corporate