Blog
Uncertainty meets its match
In brief Despite an upturn in the economic outlook, uncertainty remains ingrained into business operations today. As a result, most corporate treasuries are
Find out moreUnder FRTB, banks must pass the PLA test to ensure alignment between Front Office and Risk P&L, or face higher capital charges and potential use of the standardised approach.
Under FRTB regulation, PLA requires banks to assess the similarity between Front Office (FO) and Risk P&L (HPL and RTPL) on a quarterly basis. Desks which do not pass PLA incur capital surcharges or may, in more severe cases, be required to use the more conservative FRTB standardised approach (SA).
What is the purpose of PLA?
PLA ensures that the FO and Risk P&Ls are sufficiently aligned with one another at the desk level. The FO HPL is compared with the Risk RTPL using two statistical tests. The tests measure the materiality of any simplifications in a bank’s Risk model compared with the FO systems. In order to use the Internal Models Approach (IMA), FRTB requires each trading desk to pass the PLA statistical tests. Although the implementation of PLA begins on the date that the IMA capital requirement becomes effective, banks must provide a one-year PLA test report to confirm the quality of the model.
Which statistical measures are used?
PLA is performed using the Spearman Correlation and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test using the most recent 250 days of historical RTPL and HPL. Depending on the results, each desk is assigned a traffic light test (TLT) zone (see below), where amber desks are those which are allocated to neither red or green.
What are the consequences of failing PLA?
Capital increase: Desks in the red zone are not permitted to use the IMA and must instead use the more conservative SA, which has higher capital requirements. Amber desks can use the IMA but must pay a capital surcharge until the issues are remediated.
Difficulty with returning to IMA: Desks which are in the amber or red zone must satisfy statistical green zone requirements and 12-month backtesting requirements before they can be eligible to use the IMA again.
What are some of the key reasons for PLA failure?
Data issues: Data proxies are often used within Risk if there is a lack of data available for FO risk factors. Poor or outdated proxies can decrease the accuracy of RTPL produced by the Risk model. The source, timing and granularity also often differs between FO and Risk data.
Missing risk factors: Missing risk factors in the Risk model are a common cause of PLA failures. Inaccurate RTPL values caused by missing risk factors can cause discrepancies between FO and Risk P&Ls and lead to PLA failures.
Roadblocks to finding the sources of PLA failures
FO and Risk mapping: Many banks face difficulties due to a lack of accurate mapping between risk factors in FO and those in Risk. For example, multiple risk factors in the FO systems may map to a single risk factor in the Risk model. More simply, different naming conventions can also cause issues. The poor mapping can make it difficult to develop an efficient and rapid process to identify the sources of P&L differences.
Lack of existing processes: PLA is a new requirement which means there is a lack of existing infrastructure to identify causes of P&L failures. Although they may be monitored at the desk level, P&L differences are not commonly monitored at the risk factor level on an ongoing basis. A lack of ongoing monitoring of risk factors makes it difficult to pre-empt issues which may cause PLA failures and increase capital requirements.
Zanders’ approach overcomes the above issues by producing analytics despite any underlying mapping issues between FO and Risk P&L data. Using our algorithm, risk factors are ranked depending upon how statistically likely they are to be causing differences between HPL and RTPL. Our metric, known as risk factor ‘alpha’, can be tracked on an ongoing basis, helping banks to remediate underlying issues with risk factors before potential PLA failures.
Zanders’ P&L attribution solution has been implemented at a Tier-1 bank, providing the necessary infrastructure to identify problematic risk factors and improve PLA desk statuses. The solution provided multiple benefits to increase efficiency and transparency of workstreams at the bank.
As it is a new regulatory requirement, passing the PLA test has been a key concern for many banks. Although the test itself is not considerably difficult to implement, identifying why a desk may be failing can be complicated. In this article, we present a PLA tool which has already been successfully implemented at one of our large clients. By helping banks to identify the underlying risk factors which are causing desks to fail, remediation becomes much more efficient. Efficient remediation of desks which are failing PLA, in turn, reduces the amount of capital charges which banks may incur.
In brief Despite an upturn in the economic outlook, uncertainty remains ingrained into business operations today. As a result, most corporate treasuries are
Find out moreAfter a long period of negative policy rates within Europe, the past two years marked a period with multiple hikes of the overnight rate by central banks in Europe, such as the European
Find out moreOn the 22nd of August, SAP and Zanders hosted a webinar on the topic of optimizing your treasury processes with SAP S/4HANA, with the focus on how the benefit from S/4HANA for the cash &
Find out moreIn the high-stakes world of private equity, where the pressure to deliver exceptional returns is relentless, the playbook is evolving. Gone are the days when financial engineering—relying
Find out moreThe Basel IV reforms, which are set to be implemented on 1 January 2025 via amendments to the EU Capital Requirement Regulation, have introduced changes to the Standardized Approach for
Find out moreWith the introduction of the updated Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR3), which has entered into force on 9 July 2024, the European Union's financial landscape is poised for significant
Find out moreThe heightened fluctuations observed in the commodity and energy markets from 2021 to 2022 have brought Treasury's role in managing these risks into sharper focus. While commodity prices
Find out moreVaR has been one of the most widely used risk measures in banks for decades. However, due to the non-additive nature of VaR, explaining the causes of changes to VaR has always been
Find out moreThe Covid-19 pandemic triggered unprecedented market volatility, causing widespread failures in banks' internal risk models. These backtesting failures threatened to increase capital
Find out moreChallenges with backtesting Expected Shortfall Recent regulations are increasingly moving toward the use of Expected Shortfall (ES) as a measure to capture risk. Although ES fixes many
Find out moreAcross the whole of Europe, banks apply different techniques to model their IFRS9 Expected Credit Losses on a best estimate basis. The diverse spectrum of modelling techniques raises the
Find out moreAs organizations continue to adapt to the rapidly changing business landscape, one of the most pivotal shifts is the migration of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to the cloud.
Find out moreWhile many business and SAP users are familiar with its core functionalities, such as limit management applying different limit types and the core functionality of attributable amount
Find out moreIn brief: Prevailing uncertainty in geopolitical, economic and regulatory environments demands a more dynamic approach to default modelling. Traditional methods such as logistic
Find out moreThe recent periods of commodity price volatility have brought commodity risk management to the spotlight in numerous companies, where commodities constitute a substantial component of the
Find out moreIn brief Prepayment modelling can help institutions successfully prepare for and navigate a rise in prepayments due to changes in the financial landscape. Two important prepayment
Find out moreThe corporate landscape is continuously reshaped by strategic realignments such as mergers, divestments, and other M&A activities, wherein a company divests a portion of its business
Find out moreThe evolving economic landscape has placed a spotlight on the critical role of treasury in value creation. Our latest roundtable, themed ‘Treasury’s Role in Value Creation,’ delved
Find out moreThis article highlights key points mentioned in our whitepaper: Treasury 4.x - The age of productivity, performance and steering. You can download the full whitepaper here. Summary:
Find out moreWhether a corporate operates through a decentralized model, shared service center or even global business services model, identifying which invoices a customer has paid and in some cases,
Find out moreIn a continued effort to ensure we offer our customers the very best in knowledge and skills, Zanders has acquired Fintegral.
In a continued effort to ensure we offer our customers the very best in knowledge and skills, Zanders has acquired Optimum Prime.
You need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information