The recommendations for the disclosure of climate-related financial information by the Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), published in 2017, have become the de-facto disclosure standards world-wide.
An increasing number of policy makers and regulators have embedded the recommendations in industry guidance and laws. In this article we summarize the TCFD recommendations, taking into account the additional guidance that has been provided by the TCFD since the original recommendations were published.
Key takeaway:We recommend that firms begin collecting data and amend internal processes that enable them to disclose climate-related information in line with the recommendations of the Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Background
The Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) was established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) in December 2015 to develop climate-related disclosures that “could promote more informed investment, credit [or lending], and insurance underwriting decisions” and, in turn, “would enable stakeholders to understand better the concentrations of carbon-related assets in the financial sector and the financial system’s exposures to climate-related risks.” The TCFD finalized its recommendations in June 20171 and, based on the subsequent experience, published implementation guidance in 20212.
In line with this goal, the recommendations and implementation guidance are intended for all financial and non-financial organizations with public debt or equity. However, the TCFD encourages all organizations to implement the recommendations. An increasing number of firms are doing so and indicate explicitly as part of their annual report or financial filing where they have disclosed information in relation to individual TCFD recommendations3.
Climate-related risks and opportunities
To be able to disclose relevant climate-related information, an organization first needs to understand its exposure to climate-related risks and the opportunities that the execution of the Paris Agreement offers. Hence, it needs to evaluate the potential negative impacts of climate change on its own operations and the full value chain (covering both physical and transition risks) as well as the opportunities it offers for new products, services and markets. Subsequently, the impact of the identified risks and opportunities on revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities, and capital and financing needs to be assessed. This is summarized in the following chart.
Source: TCFD, Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, October 2021, page 9.
Appendix 1 of the TCFD implementation guidance provides examples how climate-related risks and opportunities can impact the financial statements.
The TCFD Recommendations
The TCFD has issued 11 recommendations in four main areas: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. These are summarized in the table below.
Source: TCFD, Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, October 2021, page 15.
For banks, insurance companies, asset owners, asset managers and non-financial industries that are more likely to be financially impacted by climate-related risks4, the TCFD provides additional guidance for some of the recommended disclosures.
For banks, the additional guidance entails:
Describe significant concentrations of credit exposure to carbon-related assets through the lending and financial intermediary business (Strategy – sub a).
Characterize their climate-related risks in the context of traditional banking industry risk categories such as credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk (Risk Management – sub a).
Disclose GHG emissions for their lending and other financial intermediary business activities where data and methodologies allow, calculated in line with the Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry developed by the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF Standard) or a comparable methodology (Metrics and Targets – sub b).
Metrics and targets: Additional guidance
For the metrics, the TCFD provides the following suggestions for all organizations:
Targets can be established by specifying the planned reduction or increase in each of the metrics over a chosen time horizon, including a comparison to regulatory requirements, market constraints or other goals.
In conclusion
As the TCFD recommendations are increasingly used as basis for climate-related disclosure standards in national laws and regulatory guidance, firms are advised to start collecting data and amend internal processes that enable them to disclose climate-related information in line with these recommendations. Zanders has supported various financial institutions on climate-related topics that have a bearing on the TCFD disclosure recommendations. If you want to learn more, please do not hesitate to contact us or call at +41 44 577 70 10.
Footnotes
[1] TCFD, Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, June 2017, see TCFD Recommendations
[2] TCFD, Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, October 2021, see TCFD Publications
The heightened fluctuations observed in the commodity and energy markets from 2021 to 2022 have brought Treasury's role in managing these risks into sharper focus. While commodity prices
VaR has been one of the most widely used risk measures in banks for decades. However, due to the non-additive nature of VaR, explaining the causes of changes to VaR has always been
The Covid-19 pandemic triggered unprecedented market volatility, causing widespread failures in banks' internal risk models. These backtesting failures threatened to increase capital
Challenges with backtesting Expected Shortfall
Recent regulations are increasingly moving toward the use of Expected Shortfall (ES) as a measure to capture risk. Although ES fixes many
Across the whole of Europe, banks apply different techniques to model their IFRS9 Expected Credit Losses on a best estimate basis. The diverse spectrum of modelling techniques raises the
As organizations continue to adapt to the rapidly changing business landscape, one of the most pivotal shifts is the migration of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to the cloud.
While many business and SAP users are familiar with its core functionalities, such as limit management applying different limit types and the core functionality of attributable amount
In brief:
Prevailing uncertainty in geopolitical, economic and regulatory environments demands a more dynamic approach to default modelling.
Traditional methods such as logistic
The recent periods of commodity price volatility have brought commodity risk management to the spotlight in numerous companies, where commodities constitute a substantial component of the
In brief
Prepayment modelling can help institutions successfully prepare for and navigate a rise in prepayments due to changes in the financial landscape.
Two important prepayment
The corporate landscape is continuously reshaped by strategic realignments such as mergers, divestments, and other M&A activities, wherein a company divests a portion of its business
The evolving economic landscape has placed a spotlight on the critical role of treasury in value creation. Our latest roundtable, themed ‘Treasury’s Role in Value Creation,’ delved
This article highlights key points mentioned in our whitepaper: Treasury 4.x - The age of productivity, performance and steering. You can download the full whitepaper here.
Summary:
Whether a corporate operates through a decentralized model, shared service center or even global business services model, identifying which invoices a customer has paid and in some cases,
The final article from Zanders on the DRM model presents the lifecycle of the DRM model over a single hedge accounting period and the prospective and retrospective assessments that are
The corporate treasury agenda continues to focus on cash visibility, liquidity centralization, bank/bank account rationalization, and finally digitization to enable greater operational and
The Basel IV reforms published in 2017 will enter into force on January 1, 2025, with a phase-in period of 5 years. These are probably the most important reforms banks will go through
Dan Delean recently joined Zanders as Managing Director of our newly formed US risk advisory practice. With a treasury career spanning more than 30 years, including 15 years specializing
The productivity and performance of the treasury function within insurance companies have undergone a transformative evolution, driven by the emergence of what is now termed Treasury 4.x.
In the second instalment of the Zanders series on the DRM model, the Risk Management Strategy (“RMS”) and the DRM process are introduced and with it the new concepts that the IASB have