Global market turbulence and the shifting interest rate environment have intensified uncertainty for corporate treasuries in recent years. This has forced greater attention on financial risk – particularly for businesses operating across multiple continents and managing exposure to volatile financing costs. For our global energy logistics client, these external pressures arrived at the same time as major internal changes, presenting an ideal opportunity to reassess existing treasury practices. 

“There were a lot of new faces and new knowledge with the changes at the company – it seemed a logical moment to also review all the policies and procedures in place,” says a company treasurer. “This triggered a discussion on risk management – what policies we had in place and whether they were still fit for purpose.” 

Time for pragmatism and validation 

While hedging policies existed, they were informal and inconsistently applied. As market volatility increased, it became clear that the company needed a more formal, structured framework to provide the clarity now expected – both internally and by regulators. 

“We decided it was time to formalize our policies,” the company treasurer adds. “There was more focus internally on how market volatility could impact our results. We were regularly being asked what was driving revaluations in our financials and how we could smooth this by structuring differently or applying hedge accounting.” 

The treasury team embarked on a large-scale project to refresh and refine policies and document their future risk management approach. However, while internal discussions clarified objectives and processes, to have complete confidence in their approach required more than just internal agreement. They also needed to be sure that their policies were aligned with market best practices and that their hedging strategies would withstand the scrutiny of management, auditors and regulators.  

“We realized we needed validation,” the client explains. “We wanted to know whether what we were doing was correct, whether we were missing something and how our approach compared to market practice. Were we under-hedged or over-hedged compared to peers?” 

Making risk tangible 

Zanders was a natural choice to conduct this benchmarking exercise and provide the independent, expert view the company needed. The treasury team trusted them from an earlier transfer pricing project and valued their approach – in particular the blend of technical depth and practical execution. 

We like Zanders’ pragmatic approach.

Company Treasurer

“Once you start talking about hedging policies, many consultants immediately ask for SAP dumps going back 15 years and expect you to fill an entire data room. I was afraid of that. We weren’t at the start of a project – we were almost finished – we needed a partner who could validate our work without creating a massive administrative burden. Zanders understood this.” 

Instead of a heavy data-driven exercise, Zanders designed a focused, efficient process structured around two interactive workshops: an exploratory session to discuss and map existing processes and a second session to validate conclusions. 

It really helped to get validation from an external consultant, you want to know whether what you’ve built actually makes sense, whether you’re missing something, and how competitors approach the same issues.

Company Treasurer

Within just a few weeks, Zanders delivered a clear validation report accompanied by a set of practical recommendations. One of the most valuable was linking hedge decisions more closely to the company’s financial sensitivities – a shift that has made it far easier to communicate risk to senior management.  

“These are really pragmatic solutions that have improved our policies, and our top management can see the results immediately,” says the company treasurer. “When we explain why we hedge, or what happens if we don’t, the impact becomes tangible. It’s no longer abstract. We can show: ‘If you do this, here’s the risk. If you do that, here’s the outcome.’ It makes presenting the figures much easier, and it helps management truly understand the numbers rather than just percentages.” 

Reshaping perspectives on risk 

By combining structured validation with practical recommendations, the project not only strengthened the company’s interest rate risk framework but also gave the treasury team renewed confidence in their approach. 

“Overall, the outcome of the project wasn’t to radically change our approach – it confirmed we were on the right track,” says the company treasurer. “But it also led to changes that have created more awareness and understanding across the company about the importance of risk management.”  

Perhaps most importantly, the exercise reframed the company’s view of risk in the core. “We used to think of risk management purely as minimizing risk,” the company treasurer says. “Now we see it as balancing risk, cost and impact – making informed decisions rather than automatic ones on multiple levels.” 

Looking to elevate your interest rate risk strategy? 

From volatility in global markets to rising expectations from boards, auditors and regulators, interest rate risk management has never been more critical. Zanders brings the expertise, structure and independent perspective needed to strengthen your framework and turn risk insights into strategic clarity. 

Get in touch to discover how we can help you build a clearer, more resilient approach to interest rate risk – ensuring transparency, control and confidence across your financial decision-making.

In today’s rapidly evolving financial landscape, fortifying the Financial Risk Management (FRM) function remains a top priority for CFOs. Zanders has identified a growing trend among corporations striving to modernize their current FRM practices to achieve comprehensive risk visibility, advanced risk quantification, and a holistic, proactive and integrated approach to risk management. These efforts aim ultimately to boost shareholder value. The Zanders Financial Risk Management Framework offers multinational corporations a tested and structured methodology to meet these objectives. In this article, we delve into this approach and explore the benefits it can bring to your organization. 

Financial Risks as a Collateral Effect: 

To better understand the role of FRM in a corporate setting, it's helpful to define its scope. FRM involves identifying, measuring, and managing financial risks such as market risk (including foreign exchange, interest rate, and commodity risk), liquidity risk, and credit risk. These risks often arise as side effects of inherent business risks. Business risks originate from core activities like international trade, working capital investments, capital expenditures, and supply chain design. Shareholders typically invest in companies to gain exposure to and be compensated for these specific business risks, while often viewing financial risks as unfavorable side effects. Therefore, aligning a company’s FRM practices with shareholders’ expectations is crucial. 

Increased market volatility often triggers FRM initiatives. Additionally, several internal and external factors prompt companies to reevaluate their FRM frameworks, including: 

• Geopolitical instability 

• MADS events (Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures, Spin-offs) 

• Organic growth, especially expansion into emerging markets 

• Changes in the regulatory landscape 

• Aspirations to adopt innovative, best-in-class practices 
   

A well-defined FRM framework is important for any organization, as it provides clarity on how financial risks are managed. By maintaining an up-to-date and well-structured FRM framework, companies can respond more proactively to changing market conditions and ensure better alignment with shareholder goals. 

Holistic vs. Integrated Financial Risk Management 

The landscape of FRM is evolving, with multinational corporations (MNCs) shifting from a silo-based approach to a more holistic strategy. In this modernized approach, various market risks, along with their connections to liquidity risk and the company's credit profile, are analyzed comprehensively. The new standard for treasurers increasingly involves quantitative methodologies to measure the potential impact of financial risks on key financial metrics—such as earnings, net income, and financial covenants—using "at-risk" quantification measures like earnings-at-risk (EaR). These "at-risk" methodologies are increasingly utilized to inform strategic decisions or reduce hedging costs. An illustration of this is the utilization of efficient frontier analysis to achieve optimal hedging costs for a particular "at-risk" level. 

In addition to adopting a holistic FRM approach, Zanders has observed a growing trend towards greater business integration. Effective FRM requires seamless integration between the treasury function and the broader business organization. By embedding treasury within the business processes, companies can add significant value through the early identification of financial exposures and by anticipating the financial risk implications of business decisions at their inception. Tools such as Risk Adjusted Return on Sales (RAROS) exemplify this integrated approach. With RAROS, FRM becomes an integral part of the commercial process, where the financial risks of specific transactions are quantified to determine their true economic value-add. 

The shift towards holistic and integrated FRM empowers organizations to not only manage risks more effectively but also to drive value creation and enhance financial resilience. 

Zander’s Risk Management Framework  

As financial risk managers, it's important to take a holistic approach to FRM. At Zanders, we suggest that our clients use a structured 5-step FRM framework. 

The framework is applied as follows:

1- Identification: Establish the risk exposure profile by identifying all potential sources of financial exposure, classifying their likelihood and impact on the organization, and prioritizing them accordingly.

2- Measurement: Risk quantification involves a detailed quantitative analysis of the exposure profile. This includes assessing the probability of market events and quantifying their potential impact on financial parameters using techniques such as sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, and simulation analysis (for example, cash flow at risk, value at risk).

3- Strategy & Policy: With a clear understanding of the existing risk profile, the objectives of the risk management framework are defined, considering the specific goals of various departments such as finance, operations, and procurement. A hedging strategy is then developed in alignment with these established financial risk management objectives.

4- Process & Execution: This phase follows the development of the hedging strategy, where the toolbox for hedging is defined, and roles and responsibilities are clearly allocated within the organization.

5- Monitoring & Reporting: All activities should be supported by consistent monitoring and reporting, with exception handling capabilities and risk assessments shared across departments.

Conclusion

Amid today's unpredictable financial markets, organizations are placing greater emphasis on FRM. Establishing a future-proof FRM framework is necessary not only for safeguarding key financial parameters and enhancing risk visibility but also to support long-term business sustainability. A robust FRM framework empowers companies to communicate more effectively with debt and equity investors, as well as other stakeholders, about their financial risks. Additionally, effective financial risk control can lead to better credit ratings, thereby improving access to liquidity under more favorable conditions.

To achieve a comprehensive and successful transformation of all key areas in FRM, a structured and proven project approach is indispensable.

Why Choose Zanders?

• Comprehensive, Integrated, and Strategic Approach: Our focus is on managing financial risk to enhance shareholder value.
• Advanced Tools: We utilize extensive proprietary benchmarking and advanced risk modeling tools.
• Expertise and Experience: With over 500 treasury and risk professionals, we cover the full spectrum of FRM with deep subject matter expertise.
• Proven Track Record: Excellent references and client testimonials underscore our extensive knowledge base and successful track record in Financial Risk Management.
• Strategic Insight and Implementation Capability: We combine strategic knowledge of treasury and risk best practices with the ability to implement these solutions effectively.

In an ever-changing financial landscape, Zanders provides the expertise and structured approach necessary to build a resilient FRM framework, ensuring your organization is well-equipped to navigate future challenges while enhancing financial stability and shareholder value. To learn more, contact us.