For many companies, especially in regulated industries like finance, the fear of AI is not just philosophical; it’s a practical challenge. It stems from a perceived loss of control, a lack of transparency, and the worry that decisions made by complex models might be difficult to justify to regulators, auditors, or the public. 

This fear is understandable. When machine learning models autonomously flag transactions, deny loans, or possibly even escalate alerts to authorities, the stakes are high. The consequences affect not just business outcomes, but reputations, regulatory standing, and real people’s lives. In Financial Crime Prevention (FCP), where analysts must decide whether to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR), the need for clarity is of great importance. 

This fear doesn’t have to mean that these models have no place in these departments. Rather, it can guide us to the correct place. The focus should shift from: "how the model works" to: "how the model helps."  

Empowering Analysts

In AI deployments, explainability is treated as a technical afterthought, a set of metrics or plots that satisfy internal documentation or regulatory checklists. But in FCP, the true end-user of an AI system is the analyst. They are the ones who must interpret alerts, justify decisions, and ensure compliance. Their job is not to understand gradient boosting or SHAP values, analysts should have a focus  to make the results defensible and take informed decisions under pressure. 

Human-centered explainability means designing explanations that support this task. It’s not about simplifying for the sake of clarity, it’s about making the explanation meaningful and relevant to the task at hand. This approach should turn the model from a black box into a collaborative partner. 

Instead of presenting abstract SHAP plots, one could consider: 

  • Top contributing risk factors for each alert, along with an explanation of what each factor represents. While most models already use feature importance to describe their behavior, analysts tend to interpret these factors from a risk perspective. A simple way would be providing a mapping between model features and risk indicators which could help analysts better understand what drives an alert and why it matters. 
  • Narrative summaries that explain why a transaction deviates from expected behavior. One could for instance leverage the power of LLM’s for transforming data into plain-language interpretations.  
  • Consistency checks that show how similar cases were treated, building trust in the system’s fairness. 

Too often, explainability efforts focus on stakeholders around the model; data scientists, compliance officers, or regulators. But the real test of explainability lies with the analyst who must act on the model’s output. By centering design on their needs, we shift the conversation from how the model works to how the model helps. 

This shift doesn’t just improve usability; it builds trust. And in a domain like FCP, trust is everything. 

Explainability as a Bridge, not a Barrier 

AI continues to be a sensitive topic in the risk-conscious world of Financial Crime Prevention, largely because its explainability focuses heavily on technical model details. But the real value of AI lies in how it supports analysts, helping them interpret alerts, make informed decisions, and justify their actions with confidence. That’s why explainability should be designed with the analyst in mind. By doing this, AI becomes not only more transparent, but also more useful, more responsible, and more trusted. 

Understanding and applying explainability metrics in Financial Crime Prevention (FCP) is no longer just a technical exercise, but a human-centered challenge.  

As highlighted in our blog series on the future of FCP, explainability is just one of the critical pillars shaping responsible AI adoption in this domain. If you're navigating the complexities of explainability and wanting to ensure your AI systems are not only compliant but also trusted and usable by those on the front lines, Zanders can help. 

Get AI support

Talk to an expert about ensuring AI compliance and usability in financial crime prevention.

Contact

Fintegral

is now part of Zanders

In a continued effort to ensure we offer our customers the very best in knowledge and skills, Zanders has acquired Fintegral.

Okay

RiskQuest

is now part of Zanders

In a continued effort to ensure we offer our customers the very best in knowledge and skills, Zanders has acquired RiskQuest.

Okay

Optimum Prime

is now part of Zanders

In a continued effort to ensure we offer our customers the very best in knowledge and skills, Zanders has acquired Optimum Prime.

Okay
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.